Retirement Investment Advisors Must Now Be Independent, DOL reports

During his last days in office, President Bush changed the rules to allow brokers to provide investment advice regarding their own investment products to 401(k) holders.  A Department Of Labor representative announced this week that the DOL will overturn this regulatory change to ensure that advice provided to investors will be free of this obvious conflict of interest.

Some brokers argue that 401(k) holders need all the help they can get.  It’s true that some people with 401(k) accounts have little knowledge of finances and little interest in stocks, bonds and mutual funds.  But this regulation was like the fox guarding the hen house.

It’s possible that the advisers would direct the 401(k) holder independent of the possible commissions earned by the adviser, but an independent adviser is more likely to provide independent advice.

Phyllis C. Borzi, assistant secretary of the Department of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration, said, “Today’s workers will benefit from quality investment advice – advice that is both affordable and unbiased.”

Maybe if this sort of common sense continues, there will be a provision allowing more choice among retirement investment providers.  Sure, the 401(k) is the best option for the company, but what if they’re no longer matching?  In my opinion, the employee should have more choice.  Likely if the average 401(k) holder knew that had choices, they would be motivated to educate themselves so they wouldn’t need any adviser, independent or affiliated.

Photo courtesy of skedonk